|
Wildlife, Animals, and Plants
|
|
REFERENCES
WILDLIFE SPECIES: Gymnogyps californianus | California Condor
REFERENCES :
1. American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Checklist of North American birds.
6th ed. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press, Inc. 877 p. [21234]
2. Cohn, Jeffrey P. 1993. The flight of the California condor. Bioscience.
43(4): 206-209. [21066]
3. DeGraaf, Richard M.; Scott, Virgil E.; Hamre, R. H.; [and others]. 1991.
Forest and rangeland birds of the United States: Natural history and
habitat use. Agric. Handb. 688. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 625 p. [15856]
4. Dodd, Norris L. 1988. Fire management and southwestern raptors. In:
Gliski, R. L.; Pendleton, Beth Giron; Moss, Mary Beth; [and others],
eds. Proceedings of the southwest raptor symposium and workshop; 1986
May 21-24; Tucson, AZ. NWF Scientific and Technology Series No. 11.
Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation: 341-347. [22648]
5. Eastman, John. 1976. Lure of the burn. National Wildlife. 14(5): 10-11.
[15745]
6. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
7. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
8. Goodloe, Robin B. 1984. Recent advances in the California condor
research and recovery program. Endangered Species Technical Bulletin.
9(12): 8-10. [23111]
9. Greeley, Maureen L. 1988. Molloko: helping condors soar into the next
century. Zoonooz. 61(7): 12-14. [23109]
10. Koford, Carl B. 1953. The California condor. Nation Audubon Society
Research Report 4. New York: Dover Publishing. 154 p. [Reprinted 1966].
[23117]
11. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
12. Lehman, Robert N.; Allendorf, John W. 1989. The effects of fire, fire
exclusion and fire management on raptor habitats in the western United
States. In: Proceedings of the western raptor management symposium and
workshop; 1987 October 26-28; Boise, ID. Scientific and Technical Series
No. 12. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation: 236-244. [22324]
13. Lowe, David W.; Matthews, John R.; Moseley, C. J., eds. 1990. The
official World Wildlife Fund guide to endangered species of North
America. Washington, DC: Beacham Publishing, Inc. 3 vol. [23096]
14. Mallete, R. D. 1970. Special wildlife investigation: operation
management plan for the California condor. Project No. CAL W-054-R-02.
Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. 60 p. [23118]
15. Meretsky, Vicky J.; Snyder, Noel F. R. 1992. Range use and movements of
California condors. Condor. 94(2): 313-335. [23098]
16. National Audubon Society, Advisory Panel on the California condor. 1978.
The california condor. Audubon Conservation Report No. 6. Washington,
DC: National Audubon Society. 27 p. [Ricklefs, R. E., ed.]. [23103]
17. Nichols, R.; Menke, J. 1984. Effects of chaparral shrubland fire on
terrestrial wildlife. In: DeVries, Johannes J., ed. Shrublands in
California: literature review and research needed for management.
Contribution No. 191. Davis, CA: University of California, Water
Resources Center: 74-97. [5706]
18. Ogden, John C. 1983. The California condor recovery program: an
overview. Bird Conservation. 1: 87-102. [23101]
19. Ogden, John. 1985. The California condor. In: Audubon wildlife report:
388-399. [23110]
20. Palmer, Ralph S., editor. 1988. Handbook of North American birds. Volume
5. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 463 p. [22303]
21. Pattee, Oliver H.; Bloom, Peter H.; Scott, J. Michael; Smith, Milton R.
1990. Lead hazards within the range of the California condor. Condor.
92(4): 931-937. [23114]
22. Pattee, Oliver H.; Wilbur, Sanford R. 1989. Turkey vulture and
California condor. In: Proceedings of the western raptor management
symposium and workshop; 1987 October 26-28; Boise, ID. Scientific and
Technical Series No. 12. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation:
61-65. [23097]
23. Rea, Amadeo M. 1981. California condor captive breeding: a recovery
proposal. Environment Southwest. 492: 8-12. [23113]
24. Snyder, Noel F. R. 1986. California condor recovery program. Raptor
Research Reports. 5: 56-71. [23099]
25. Snyder, Noel F. R.; Ramey, Rob R.; Sibley, Fred C. 1986. Nest-site
biology of the California condor. Condor. 88(2): 228-241. [23100]
26. Toone, William D.; Risser, Arthur C., Jr. 1988. Captive management of
the California condor (Gymnogyps californianus). International Zoo
Yearbook. 27: 50-58. [23102]
27. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, California
Condor Recovery Team. 1984. California condor recovery plan. [Revised].
Portland, OR: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service. 110 p. [+ appendices]. [23095]
28. Ronco, Frank. 1970. Engelmann spruce seed dispersal and seedling
establishment in clearcut forest openings in Colorado--a progress
report. Res. Note RM-168. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. 7 p. [16496]
29. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992.
Landmark legislation. Endangered Species Technical Bulletin. 17(12):
2-3. [21323]
30. Verner, Jared. 1978. California condors: status of the recovery effort.
Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-28. Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
30 p. [20666]
31. Verner, Jared; Boss, Allan S., tech. coords. 1980. California wildlife
and their habitats: western Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-37.
Berkeley, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific
Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 439 p. [10237]
32. Wallace, Michael. 1991. Methods and strategies for the release of
California condors to the wild. In: AAZPA [American Association of
Zoological Parks and Aquariums], annual conference proceedings: 121-128.
On file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT.
[23112]
33. Wiemeyer, Stanley N.; Scott, J. Michael; Anderson, Marilyn P.; [and
others]. 1988. Environmental contaminants in California condors. Journal
of Wildlife Management. 52(2): 238-247. [23115]
34. Wilbur, Sanford R. 1978. The California condor, 1966-76: a look at its
past and future. North American Fauna No. 72. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 56 p. [23094]
35. Wilcove, David S.; May, Robert M. 1986. The fate of the California
condor. Nature. 319(6048): 16. [23116]
36. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States
and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620]
37. Mefta, R. 1994 [pers. comm.]
38. Griffin, James R. 1977. Oak woodland. In: Barbour, Michael G.; Malor,
Jack, eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York: John Wiley
and Sons: 383-415. [7217]
39. California Department of Fish and Game. 1990. State and federal
endangered and threatened animals of California. Sacramento, CA:
California Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Protection Division and
Wildlife Management Division. 13 p. [18827]
40. Heady, Harold F. 1977. Valley grassland. In: Barbour, Michael G.; Major,
Jack, eds. Terrestrial vegetation of California. New York: John Wiley
and Sons: 491-514. [7215]
Related categories for Wildlife Species: Gymnogyps californianus
| California Condor
|
 |
